Data-Driven Learning of Safety-Critical Control with Stochastic Control Barrier Functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control barrier functions are widely used to synthesize safety-critical controls. The existence of Gaussiantype noise may lead to unsafe actions and result in severe consequences. While studies are widely done in safety-critical control for stochastic systems, in many real-world applications, we do not have the knowledge of the stochastic component of the dynamics. In this paper, we study safety-critical control of stochastic systems with an unknown diffusion part and propose a data-driven method to handle these scenarios. More specifically, we propose a data-driven stochastic control barrier function (DDSCBF) framework and use supervised learning to learn the unknown stochastic dynamics via the DDSCBF scheme. Under some reasonable assumptions, we provide guarantees that the DDSCBF scheme can approximate the Itô derivative of the stochastic control barrier function (SCBF) under partially unknown dynamics using the universal approximation theorem. We also show that we can achieve the same safety guarantee using the DDSCBF scheme as with SCBF in previous work without requiring the knowledge of stochastic dynamics. We use two non-linear stochastic systems to validate our theory in simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".