MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315488788 · doi:10.1109/cdc51059.2022.9993231

Optimal Network Location in Infinite Horizon LQG Graphon Mean Field Games

2022· article· en· W4315488788 on OpenAlexaff
Rinel Foguen-Tchuendom, Shuang Gao, Minyi Huang, Peter E. Caines

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean field theoryNode (physics)Linear-quadratic-Gaussian controlGaussianClass (philosophy)Field (mathematics)MathematicsHorizonComputer scienceMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsOptimal controlArtificial intelligencePure mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose to study a class of infinite horizon linear quadratic Gaussian Graphon Mean Field Games (GM-FGs) inspired by the infinite horizon Mean Field Games in [1]. Graphon Mean Field Games (GMFGs) are non-uniform generalizations of Mean Field Games where the non-uniformity of agents is characterized by the nodes on which they are located in a network. Under mild conditions, we obtain for almost every node, an analytical expression for the cost at GMFG equilibrium, and propose a necessary and sufficient condition under which a particular node in the network is associated with the minimal cost at GMFG equilibrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)Same topicMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsFrench-language works237,207