MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315489024 · doi:10.1109/cdc51059.2022.9992565

Thompson-Sampling Based Reinforcement Learning for Networked Control of Unknown Linear Systems

2022· article· en· W4315489024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear-quadratic-Gaussian controlReinforcement learningLogarithmRegretNetwork packetBounded functionControl theory (sociology)GeneralizationController (irrigation)Sampling (signal processing)GaussianDiscrete mathematicsMathematicsComputer scienceOptimal controlControl (management)Mathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there has been considerable interest in reinforcement learning for linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) systems. In this paper, we consider a generalization of such systems where the controller and the plant are connected over an unreliable packet drop channel. Packet drops cause the system dynamics to switch between controlled and uncontrolled modes. This switching phenomena introduces new challenges in designing learning algorithms. We identify a sufficient condition under which the regret of Thompson sampling-based reinforcement learning algorithm with dynamic episodes (TSDE) at horizon T is bounded by $\widetilde {\mathcal{O}}\left( {\sqrt T } \right)$, where the $\widetilde {\mathcal{O}}\left( \cdot \right)$ notation hides logarithmic factors in T. These are the first results to generalize regret bounds of LQG systems to packet-drop networked control models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it