MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315489189 · doi:10.1109/cdc51059.2022.9992884

Finite-time Event-triggered Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems

2022· article· en· W4315489189 on OpenAlexaff
Niladri Sekhar Tripathy, Mohammadreza Chamanbaz, Roland Bouffanais

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equationRiccati equationControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov functionNonlinear systemMathematicsController (irrigation)Linear-quadratic-Gaussian controlDifferential equationComputer scienceOptimal controlMathematical optimizationControl (management)Mathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers an approximate solution of the event-triggered Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (ET-HJB) equation to derive a finite-time suboptimal event-triggered control law for a class of nonlinear systems. To reduce the communication and computation overhead, the control law is computed and actuated after violating a predefined state-dependent event triggering condition. To obtain the controller gain, the ET-HJB equation is approximated as a state-dependent differential Riccati equation (SDRE). After converting the ET-HJB into an SDRE, a frozen time concept is used to eliminate the issues related to state dependency in the system and input matrices between two consecutive events. This helps reframe the SDRE into a simple differential Riccati equation (DRE), where the state-dependent system and input matrices remain fixed until the next event occurs. Using the solution of a differential Lyapunov equation, the solution of the DRE is computed forward in time. The designed event-triggered control law is readily amenable to an online implementation, and also it ensures the input-to-state stability of closed-loop systems. Simulation results are reported to prove the efficacy of the proposed control approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)Same topicAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlFrench-language works237,207