MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315560041 · doi:10.1017/9781800106505.003

Feminism and Jewishness in Viennese Literary Modernism

2022· other· en· W4315560041 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismModernism (music)ArtLiteratureArt historyGender studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viennese modernism ( die Wiener Moderne ) commonly refers to the intellectual atmosphere in Vienna between 1890 and 1910 and to the experimental cultural products and theories that emerged in fields as diverse as literature, art, music, architecture, philosophy, linguistics, and the sciences, including new emerging medical sub-disciplines such as psychology and sexology. In the field of literature, the term literary modernism is often used interchangeably with the concept Jung-Wien (Young Vienna). This term seems to have come into being quite circuitously during a visit by Henrik Ibsen to Vienna in 1891. Piecing together excerpts from Hugo von Hofmannthal’s diary with reflections made by Hermann Bahr several decades later, the modernist scholar Gotthart Wunberg relates that the seventeen-year-old Hofmannsthal referred to “uns Jungen in Wien” (us young ones in Vienna) when he visited Ibsen in his hotel. This choice of words, according to Hofmannsthal, led to a perceived misunderstanding with Ibsen. Whereas Hofmannsthal used the words to express his admiration for Ibsen and his belief that a new generation of artists revered Ibsen and saw him as a leader in the quest for the emancipation of (and from) the self ( Selbstbefreiung ), Ibsen assumed that Hofmannsthal was referring to an association of young artists whose only concern was creating and producing works of art. According to Wunberg, this exchange was most likely relayed to the writer and literary critic Hermann Bahr, whom Hofmannsthal met for the first time the following week. Bahr’s reflections on Ibsen’s visit written several decades later imply that this was not only the beginning of a new literary term, but also a new consciousness that united various diverse Viennese authors: “Damit war Jungösterreich öffentlich erschienen. Aus den Händen Ibsens übernahm ich es” (With that Young-Austria was publicly coined. I accepted it from the hands of Ibsen). The idea that the origin of the term Jung-Wien stems from Ibsen’s visit to Vienna is both noteworthy and ironic. First, Ibsen was not only an iconic symbol of modernism, but his writing represented a literary style that many Viennese modernists were attempting to challenge and move beyond. Second, the term, as used by Hofmannsthal, connotes that it was a male movement (“uns Jungen” in the sense of “us boys”), as well as a youthful and innovative one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207