MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315574262 · doi:10.21494/iste.op.2023.0916

L’économie circulaire et l’inclusion socio-économique en Afrique Occidentale

2023· article· fr· W4315574262 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Bienfait, Emmanuel Raufflet

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Technologie Développement · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)HumanitiesGeographySociologyArtAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article explore les liens entre économie circulaire (EC) et l'inclusion socio-économique en Afrique Occidentale dans les discours et pratiques de la coopération internationale (CI).Cet article identifie deux constats principaux.D'abord, l'économie circulaire, telle que promue, omet souvent les enjeux et les objectifs d'inclusion socioéconomique.L'économie circulaire, en tant que modèle réformiste, peut promouvoir un monde juste et durable avec l'aide de la CI tout en tenant compte de ses limites.Ensuite, alors que l'Afrique circularise depuis toujours à de nombreuses échelles et dans de nombreux contextes souvent informels dans des situations d'innovation sous contraintes, les promoteurs de l'économie circulaire et de la coopération internationale pourraient reconnaitre ces savoirs et pratiques d'économie circulaire implicites existants en mettant en avant une société circulaire inclusive socio-économique.Des pistes de recherche et d'actions sont proposées pour promouvoir une EC réformiste sociale, dans le respect des savoir-faire culturels et locaux.ABSTRACT.This article explores the links between the circular economy (CE) and socio-economic inclusion in West Africa within the discourse and practices of international cooperation (IC).It identifies two main findings.First, the circular economy, as promoted, often omits socio-economic inclusion issues and goals.The circular economy, as a reformist model, can promote a just and sustainable world with the help of IC, all while considering its limits.Second, while Africa has always circularized at many scales and in many often informal contexts in situations of innovation under constraints, the promoters of the circular economy and international cooperation could recognize this knowledge and the practices of an existing implicit circular economy by promoting an inclusive socio-economic circular society.Avenues for research and action are proposed to promote a social reformist CE, while respecting cultural and local know-how. MOTS-CLÉS. Économie circulaire

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience Technologie DéveloppementSame topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207