Inhibition of the TRIM24 bromodomain reactivates latent HIV-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expression of the HIV-1 genome by RNA Polymerase II is regulated at multiple steps, as are most cellular genes, including recruitment of general transcription factors and control of transcriptional elongation from the core promoter. We recently discovered that tripartite motif protein TRIM24 is recruited to the HIV-1 Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) by interaction with TFII-I and causes transcriptional elongation by stimulating association of PTEF-b/ CDK9. Because TRIM24 is required for stimulation of transcription from the HIV-1 LTR, we were surprised to find that IACS-9571, a specific inhibitor of the TRIM24 C-terminal bromodomain, induces HIV-1 provirus expression in otherwise untreated cells. IACS-9571 reactivates HIV-1 in T cell lines bearing multiple different provirus models of HIV-1 latency. Additionally, treatment with this TRIM24 bromodomain inhibitor encourages productive HIV-1 expression in newly infected cells and inhibits formation of immediate latent transcriptionally repressed provirus. IACS-9571 synergizes with PMA, ionomycin, TNF-α and PEP005 to activate HIV-1 expression. Furthermore, co-treatment of CD4 + T cells from individuals with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with PEP005 and IACS-9571 caused robust provirus expression. Notably, IACS-9571 did not cause global activation of T cells; rather, it inhibited induction of IL2 and CD69 expression in human PBMCs and Jurkat T cells treated with PEP005 or PMA. These observations indicate the TRIM24 bromodomain inhibitor IACS-9571 represents a novel HIV-1 latency reversing agent (LRA), and unlike other compounds with this activity, causes partial suppression of T cell activation while inducing expression of latent provirus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".