Distributed RIS-Assisted FD Systems with Discrete Phase Shifts: A Reinforcement Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the sum-rate maximization problem of a distributed reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted full-duplex wireless system, where the availability of finite-resolution phase shifts at the RIS is considered. The aim is to optimize the transmit beamformers and RIS phase shifts, subject to the practical discrete phase shift and power constraints. The optimization problem is decoupled into two sub-problems; transmit beamforming and RIS phase shifts optimization. The transmit beamforming problem is mathematically addressed using approximate and closed-form solutions, while the discrete RIS phase shifts are optimized using a reinforcement learning (RL) approach. The existence and absence of a strong direct line-of-sight is investigated to show the effect of the phase shift optimization on the sum-rate. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed RL for the discrete phase shifts optimization provides a near-optimal performance with a small number of bits even for a large number of RIS elements, while improving the sum-rate compared to the random phase shift scenario and reducing the computational complexity compared to the state-of-the-art works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".