Martha Paynter, Illustrated by Julia Hutt, <i>Abortion to Abolition: Reproductive Health and Justice in Canada</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Martha Paynter’s Abortion to Abolition: Reproductive Health and Justice in Canada makes a valuable contribution to popular and accessible literature on reproductive justice in Canada. The book is divided along the major tenets of reproductive justice: bodily autonomy, the right not to have children, the right to have children, and the right to parent the children we have in safe and healthy environments (presented as parenting in safety and parenting in prison). To illustrate the different tenets, Paynter highlights individual stories, which is an impactful approach, especially given the relatively brief nature of the narratives. So structured, this collection could be particularly valuable to teachers who often look for accessible resources to add gender analysis to their instruction. Indeed, a noteworthy feature of the book is the illustrations provided by Julia Hutt. Each chapter includes a graphic image that serves as a homage to the courageous and important advocates and actors highlighted therein; Hutt’s illustrations in the ‘parenting in prison’ section are particularly moving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".