MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4315629460 · doi:10.1117/12.2645028

Development of the HySpex hyperspectral drill core scanner: case study on exploration core from the Au-rich LaRonde-Penna volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit, Quebec, Canada

2023· article· en· W4315629460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Friederike Körting, Julio E. Hernandez, Pesal Koirala, Miranda Lehman, Thomas Monecke, David Lindblom

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingGeologyDrillScannerGeochemistryMining engineeringMineralogyRemote sensingComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HySpex is presenting an integrated solution for hyperspectral drill core imaging. The system’s mineral mapping capabilities are presented in close cooperation with renowned academic and industrial partners through the Center to Advance the Science of Exploration to Reclamation in Mining (CASERM) led by the Colorado School of Mines and Virginia Tech. Utilizing HySpex cameras covering the spectral range between 400 and 2500 nm, the system is capable of scanning full core boxes in seconds. Using Prediktera’s new Breeze-GEO Software, real-time mineral mapping of the highest quality is achieved. Apart from different interactive qualitative and quantitative data analysis tools offered by Breeze, the platform includes the publicly available USGS Material Identification and Classification Algorithm (MICA) for mineral identification, as well as the Minimum Wavelength Mapping (MWL) algorithm. The scanner’s capabilities are demonstrated using drill cores from the LaRonde-Penna deposit. The deposit is located within the Archean Abitibi greenstone belt of Ontario and Quebec, Canada, which is home to numerous Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) deposits. LaRonde-Penna contains an endowment of 71 Mt of ore grading on average 3.9 g/t Au and economic grades of Zn, Cu and Pd. Because the deposits have been studied extensively over the past decades, cores from the deposit open up a unique opportunity for research and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→