MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PPsky: Privacy-Preserving Skyline Queries with Secret Sharing in eHealthcare

2022· article· en· W4315629677 on OpenAlex
Songnian Zhang, Suprio Ray, Rongxing Lu, Yunguo Guan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSkylineComputer scienceSecret sharingScheme (mathematics)Information privacySecurity analysisComputer securityCryptographyData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applying skyline queries to medical data can considerably benefit medical analysis in eHealthcare. However, as medical data often involves sensitive personal data, privacy concerns have become a significant impediment to the development of eHealthcare. Although several privacy-preserving skyline query schemes in eHealthcare have been put forth, they need a trusted platform to generate and assign secret keys for the multi-source scenario. In addition, those schemes incur non-trivial computational costs on resource-limited entities. To address these limitations, we propose a novel privacy-preserving skyline query scheme, named PPsky, based on arithmetic secret sharing, in which a series of secure protocols are designed to handle the basic operations in skyline queries. Security analysis illustrates that our PPsky scheme is privacy-preserving, and the evaluation results also validate the efficiency of our PPsky scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0150.019
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it