MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intelligent Ensemble based System for Rare Attacks Dectection in IoT Networks

2022· article· en· W4315629866 on OpenAlexaff
Muder Almiani, Alia AbuGhazleh, Yaser Jararweh, Abdul Razaque

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemRobustness (evolution)Internet of ThingsClassifier (UML)Data miningComputer securityArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lack of security techniques that assures the integrity of data generated by the Internet of Things networks is one of the major stumbling blocks that hinders the whole development of these networks. As smart devices generate and transmit confidential and sensitive data, in these cases, data leakage can lead in many cases to drastic consequences. These types of attacks are called compromised attacks and the U2R and R2L subcategories are typical examples. Despite various intrusion detection systems designed for detecting compromised attacks, many of them are deficient and suboptimum due to the highly sophisticated behavior of these attacks that mimic normal ones, as well as the rarity of occurrence, and lack of training records keep this area inconclusive. Therefore, this paper presents an ensemble-based intrusion detection system to identify rare hard-to-detect attacks (U2R and R2L) in IoT networks. The ensemble is composed of two main tiers. Each tier consists of a major improved KNN classifier driven by multiple auxiliary classical KNN classifiers. the combined responses of these detection tires are fused to provide the optimal detection performance for minority attacks. The experimental analysis unveiled that the proposed system achieved a high detection accuracy reaches up to 96.65% and 100% for R2L and U2R respectively along with Cohen's kappa coefficient reaches up to 0.9778 and 0.996, which confirms the reliability and robustness of the proposed system to be deployed in loT networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207