MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy Efficiency and Power Allocation Optimization in Hardware-Impaired Full-Duplex Access Point

2022· article· en· W4315630085 on OpenAlexaff
Emad Saleh, Malek Alsmadi, Salama Ikki

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKarush–Kuhn–Tucker conditionsComputer scienceEfficient energy useWirelessTransmission (telecommunications)Quality of serviceMaximizationSpectral efficiencyPower budgetOptimization problemFractional programmingFadingTransceiverNakagami distributionPower (physics)Mathematical optimizationPower controlElectronic engineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithmNonlinear programmingMathematicsElectrical engineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full-duplex (FD) communications have been recognized as one of the promising wireless transmission candidates for the future of wireless communication and networking technologies, thanks to their ability to greatly improve spectral efficiency (SE) and dramatically enhance energy efficiency (EE). In this paper, we study the influence of hardware impairments (HWIs) on single-input single-output (SISO) FD access point (AP). More precisely, we study the EE when the system's terminals have impaired transceivers. Optimization problem for EE maximization is formulated to fulfill quality of service (QoS) and power budget constraints. We propose an algorithm to solve the optimization problem by using the fractional programming theory and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions technique. The results unveil that excellent power allocation is crucial in FD communication networks and the proposed algorithm outperforms the maximum power transmission scheme. The results also reveal that HWIs degrade both EE and SE performance. Moreover, at high power region, no further improvements can be obtained by increasing the transmission power. Finally, we assume that all fading channels demonstrate Nakagami-m distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207