MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UAV-Assisted Networks With Underlaid Ambient Backscattering: Modeling and Outage Analysis

2022· article· en· W4315630106 on OpenAlex
Xu Jiang, Min Sheng, Nan Zhao, Junyu Liu, Dusit Niyato, F. Richard Yu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBackscatter (email)Computer scienceFadingWirelessMonte Carlo methodElectronic engineeringReal-time computingRemote sensingTelecommunicationsComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringGeographyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combining with flexibly deployed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and energy-efficient ambient backscatter communication, the UAV-aided ambient backscatter communication can establish wireless links for isolated IoT nodes efficiently. In this paper, we investigate a UAV air-ground networks with underlaid ambient backscatter communications, where the emitted signal from the UAV is leveraged as radio frequency (RF) carrier for ambient backscattering. First, we establish a system model of the UAV air-ground networks with underlaid ambient backscatter communications. Then, the expressions of the outage probabilities for both the backscatter link and the air-ground link are derived. In addition, the asymptotic outage probabilities of infinite transmit power and infinite fading parameter are analyzed. Simulations show that the analytical results match well with the Monte Carlo results, which verifies the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it