Computation Offloading and Energy Harvesting Schemes for Sum Rate Maximization in Space-Air-Ground Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The space-air-ground (SAG) integrated networks will play a major role in the sixth generation (6G) mobile networks, which will provide global coverage, full connection and pervasive intelligence services for multiple ground Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Moreover, massive computing tasks can be either performed by local devices, or offloaded to edge servers, such as low orbit satellites, high altitude platforms (HAPs) and remote base stations. Nevertheless, the joint computation and communication resource allocation solutions are becoming challenging due to the large-scale state space, time-varying network scenarios, and limited battery capacity. In this paper, we propose a SAG-integrated three-layer heterogenous network model to maximize the sum-rate of ground IoT devices, which further enhances the deep integration of communication and computation resources. Additionally, we develop a Lyapunov-assisted multi-agent proximal policy optimization algorithm to process the task scheduling, HAP selection, battery harvesting, and CPU cycle frequency optimization. Extensive simulation results corroborate that the proposed method has superior performance gains in terms of the remaining battery capacity, energy consumption, and maximum average sum-rate compared with the state-of-the-art baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".