MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Agile Design and Dimensioning of MEC-NFV Infrastructure to Support Heterogeneous Service Chains

2022· article· en· W4315630319 on OpenAlexaff
Lina Abou Haibeh, M.C.E. Yagoub, Abdallah Jarray

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtual networkDimensioningSoftware deploymentCloud computingVirtualizationDistributed computingMobile edge computingService (business)Computer networkAgile software developmentServerSoftware engineeringOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile edge computing (MEC) has recently become a key technology that appeared in response to the increasing focus on the emergence of new heterogeneous service chain requests, the resource-constrained mobile devices, and the long delay provided by the conventional Cloud Data Centers. Although many researchers have investigated how the heterogeneous service function chain (SFC) requests can interact with the MEC system, very few have tackled how to deploy a flexible MEC infrastructure at the mobile operator for the expected mobile traffic. This paper addresses the design and dimensioning of an agile MEC infrastructure problem with aid of Network Function Virtualization (NFV) technology. To improve physical resource utilization, we consider virtual instances resources overheads and virtual instances shareability in the deployment process. A mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) is used to construct a physical MEC system design by mapping the received SFCs' virtual networks to the dimensioned MEC nodes while minimizing the deployment cost. Numerical results highlight the value gained in reducing the deployment cost while guaranteeing the delay requirements for different SFCs with high acceptance rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207