MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315631580 · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvad010

Ageing and age-related issues in congenital heart disease: a new niche in treatment, care, and research

2023· article· en· W4315631580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bo Daelman, Philip Moons

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsMedicineAgeingGerontologyIntensive care medicineDiseaseHeart diseaseNicheCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is defined as ‘a gross structural abnormality of the heart and/or intra-thoracic great vessels that is actually or potentially of functional significance’.1 CHD occurs in almost 1 in 100 newborn babies globally.2 Whereas five decades ago, the life expectancy was rather limited; nowadays, 90% of children with CHD can reach adulthood.3 This demonstrates the successes of CHD medical treatment which includes congenital cardiac surgery and catheter interventions. The increased longevity, however, poses new challenges to healthcare and healthcare professionals. We need to better understand the ageing process and the development of age-related problems in people with CHD. The first empirical data showed that older persons with CHD constitute a specific group of individuals with high morbidity, healthcare utilization, and mortality.4–6 There are also indications of accelerated ageing in people with CHD. Indeed, epidemiological and clinical studies found that age-related morbidities, such as coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, erectile dysfunction, diabetes, dementia, or cancer, occur more often and at an earlier age in people with CHD than in the general population.7 This accelerated ageing is believed to be a result of chronic, systemic inflammation, because patients with CHD are found to have an activated inflammatory response,8 especially those with cyanotic CHD9 or after cardiac surgery.10 In this respect, the concept of ‘inflamm-ageing’ is proposed, which is the impact of imbalance of inflammation homeostasis on ageing.11 This inflamm-ageing is likely the basis for an increasing disparity between the chronological (i.e. the number of years since birth) and biological age (i.e. cellular integrity) of people with CHD compared with non-afflicted individuals (Central illustration). Inflammation, ageing, and frailty in congenital heart disease (CHD). Ageing is associated with functional consequences, such as patients becoming frail. Frailty is a decline in functional reserve, resistance and resilience of multiple organ systems. Frailty leads to accelerated functional decline and adverse health outcomes. Although frailty in CHD has not been comprehensively investigated, preliminary data on a small sample of adults with CHD aged 40 years or older showed that 41.8% were pre-frail (at risk for frailty because patients fulfil some, but not all, frailty criteria) and 8.9% were frail.7 In the age cohorts of 50–59 and 60+ years, frailty was observed in 10 and 21.7%, respectively.7 The relatively high proportion of pre-frail and frail statuses in this sample of middle-aged and ‘young-old’ patients illustrates the repercussions of accelerated ageing on patients’ functioning. There is a potential link between inflammation, accelerated ageing, and frailty in CHD (see Central illustration) but it has not been empirically investigated yet. The AccelerAGE project (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05667870) is aiming to shed light on this new niche in CHD research. In the current issue of the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, results of an international study on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in different age groups of adults with CHD were published.12 This study is part of the large APPROACH-IS project13,14 and scrutinized PROs in older patients and compared them with younger age cohorts. The main focus was on physical and mental health status, psychological distress, and quality of life. Adjusted for demographic and medical characteristics, patients aged ≥60 years had a lower physical health status, although fewer anxiety symptoms and a better mental health status compared with patients aged 40–59 and 18–39 years. Additionally, older patients reported higher life satisfaction than patients aged 40–49 years.12 Despite their better emotional health, the observed lower physical health status may not be minimalized. The experienced limitations not only could be caused by sarcopenia defined as the age-associated loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, but can also be linked with frailty.12 As a consequence of the physical decline, older CHD patients will have a higher morbidity, healthcare utilization, and mortality.4–6 This empirical study is accompanied by a ‘Patient Perspective’, which is a relatively novel section in the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.15 In ‘Patient Perspectives’, a patient reflects on research findings described in a paper, or they give additional insights into what this means for patients and families. The accompanied Patient Perspective has been written by Ms Shelagh Ross, an active patient advocate in Canada living with CHD. She describes that living with CHD not only comes with a heavy physical and psychological burden, but also has a silver lining: older patients, similar to the general population, experience greater life satisfaction, and reduced anxiety. However, in her opinion, the study failed to capture the essential experience of simply being alive against all expectations. Older CHD patients are surprised and grateful to still be here which may contribute to their better mental health status.15 Additionally, living with CHD results in them deciding to celebrate and enjoy the little things in life, which also adds to a higher life satisfaction. This has been confirmed in prior research on the relationship between sense of coherence and quality of life in people with CHD.16,17 On the other hand, it also could be possible that the disease sets their life satisfaction bar so low, that small accomplishments are enough. Lastly, she stated that it would be possible that they just learned to settle.15 This last argument is also proposed as a possible explanation in the APPROACH-IS study.12 In conclusion, due to the better life expectancy of patients with CHD, the first generation of older and even geriatric patients is arising. Unfortunately, recent studies described that age-related morbidities occur more often and at an earlier age in people with CHD than in the general population.7 This accelerated ageing is an emerging problem with imminent consequences. Therefore, research is needed to gain insight into the (accelerated) ageing process and the concept of inflamm-ageing. Such studies will help us to provide better care and treatment for the ageing CHD population. The research letter on the APPROACH-IS study and the Patient Perspective published in this issue of the Journal contribute to the body of knowledge because it provides relevant empirical evidence, further supported by a patient’s lived experiences. This work was supported by Research Foundation Flanders (grant number G072022N to P.M.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular NursingSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207