Clinical relevance of disrupted topological organization of anatomical connectivity in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph theory is a novel approach used to examine the balance of brain connectomes. However, the clinical relevance of white matter (WM) connectome changes in the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is not well understood. We aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of WM topological alterations in bvFTD. Thirty patients with probable bvFTD and 30 healthy controls underwent diffusion tensor imaging, structural MRI, and neuropsychological assessment. WM connectivity between 90 brain regions was calculated and the graph approach was applied to capture the individual characteristics of the anatomical network. Voxel-based morphometry and tract-based spatial statistics were used to present the gray matter atrophy and disrupted WM integrity. The topological organization was disrupted in patients with bvFTD both globally and locally. Compared to controls, bvFTD data showed a different pattern of hub region distributions. Notably, the nodal efficiency of the right superior orbital frontal gyrus was associated with apathy and disinhibition. Topological measures may be potential image markers for early diagnosis and disease severity monitoring of bvFTD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".