Classification of Colon and Lung Cancer Through Analysis of Histopathology Images Using Deep Learning Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last four decades, medicine and healthcare have made revolutionary advances. During this time, the true causes of many diseases were discovered and new diagnostic procedures were devised and new remedies were invented. Globally, cancer is one of the serious diseases, which has become a widespread medical issue. A credible and early finding is especially important to reduce the risk of death. In any way, it is a difficult task that relies on the expertise of histopathologists. If a histologist is unprepared, a patient’s life may be put in danger. Deep learning has gotten a lot of attention recently and is being used in medical imaging analysis. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to automate cancer detection. To better classify and for quality improvement of histopathology images, visualization techniques GradCam and SmoothGard are applied. This objective can be achieved by evaluating histopathological images of five types of colon and lung tissues using MobileNetV2 and InceptionResnetV2 models. These proposed models have accurately identified cancer tissues to a maximum of 99.95%. These models will assist medical professionals in the advancement of an automated and authentic system for detecting different types of colon and lung cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".