MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315650234 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2023.103183

Landfast sea ice break out patterns in the northern Bering Sea observed from C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar

2023· article· en· W4315650234 on OpenAlexaff
David A. Jensen, Vishnu Nandan, Andrew R. Mahoney, John Yackel, Lynn M. Resler

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArcticGeologyArctic ice packOceanographyPhysical geographyClimatologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic sea ice is declining in areal extent and seasonal duration, affecting stable landfast sea ice regimes. These landfast ice regimes are vital platforms for local indigenous subsistence hunters and epontic primary production species supporting local and regional food webs. Under changing thermodynamic and mechanical stresses, landfast ice can become more prone to break out events - unexpected mid-season detachments from the coastline. However, the prevalence of break out events in the landfast ice annual cycle on an interannual and decadal basis is generally understudied. Here, we detect and quantify landfast ice break-out events at St. Lawrence Island in the Northern Bering Sea. We accomplished this using C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery to detect landfast ice cover. We also advanced a geospatial analysis method to identify break-out events and distinguish such occurrences from end-of-season breakups. Results reveal that 35 break-outs occurred across four sections of the St. Lawrence Island coastline from 1996 − 2019, with 74 % of break-outs occurring on the northern coastlines. Break-outs generally occurred during annual cycles with higher than average landfast ice cover. During the break-out events, maximum temperatures seldom exceed conditions promoting melt, whereas wind speeds are, on average, 2 m/s faster compared to end-of-season breakup events. However, additional datasets are needed to understand better the influence of tidal amplitude and ocean currents on detected break-out occurrence and location. Our study provides the basis for future research to understand break-out events in landfast ice annual cycles at fine spatial scales unavailable in existing sea ice datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207