MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315650458 · doi:10.1364/oe.478260

Regularization of dielectric tensor tomography

2023· article· en· W4315650458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsTomographyTensor (intrinsic definition)OpticsDielectricRefractive indexRegularization (linguistics)PhysicsPositive definitenessMathematicsGeometryEigenvalues and eigenvectorsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dielectric tensor tomography reconstructs the three-dimensional dielectric tensors of microscopic objects and provides information about the crystalline structure orientations and principal refractive indices. Because dielectric tensor tomography is based on transmission measurement, it suffers from the missing cone problem, which causes poor axial resolution, underestimation of the refractive index, and halo artifacts. In this study, we study the application of total variation and positive semi-definiteness regularization to three-dimensional tensor distributions. In particular, we demonstrate the reduction of artifacts when applied to dielectric tensor tomography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it