Preserving Privacy of Classified Authentic Satellite Lane Imagery Using Proxy Re-Encryption and UAV Technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Privacy preservation of image data has been a top priority for many applications. The rapid growth of technology has increased the possibility of creating fake images using social media as a platform. However, many people, including researchers, rely on image data for various purposes. In rural areas, lane images have a high level of importance, as this data can be used for analyzing various lane conditions. However, this data is also being forged. To overcome this and to improve the privacy of lane image data, a real-time solution is proposed in this work. The proposed methodology assumes lane images as input, which are further classified as fake or bona fide images with the help of Error Level Analysis (ELA) and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. The U-Net model ensures lane detection for bona fide lane images, which helps in the easy identification of lanes in rural areas. The final images obtained are secured by using the proxy re-encryption technique which uses RSA and ECC algorithms. This helps in ensuring the privacy of lane images. The cipher images are maintained using fog computing and processed with integrity. The proposed methodology is necessary for protecting genuine satellite lane images in rural areas, which are further used by forecasters, and researchers for making interpretations and predictions on data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".