A conserved SH3-like fold in diverse putative proteins tetramerizes into an oxidoreductase providing an antimicrobial resistance phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a potential mechanism for emergence of catalytic activity that is essential for survival, from a non-catalytic protein fold. The type B dihydrofolate reductase (DfrB) family of enzymes were first identified in pathogenic bacteria because their dihydrofolate reductase activity is sufficient to provide trimethoprim (TMP) resistance. DfrB enzymes are described as poorly evolved as a result of their unusual structural and kinetic features. No characterized protein shares sequence homology with DfrB enzymes; how they evolved to emerge in the modern resistome is unknown. In this work, we identify DfrB homologues from a database of putative and uncharacterized proteins. These proteins include an SH3-like fold homologous to the DfrB enzymes, embedded in a variety of additional structural domains. By means of functional, structural and biophysical characterization, we demonstrate that these distant homologues and their extracted SH3-like fold can display dihydrofolate reductase activity and confer TMP resistance. We provide evidence of tetrameric assembly and catalytic mechanism analogous to that of DfrB enzymes. These results contribute, to our knowledge, the first insights into a potential evolutionary path taken by this SH3-like fold to emerge in the modern resistome following introduction of TMP. This article is part of the theme issue 'Reactivity and mechanism in chemical and synthetic biology'.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".