MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315748588 · doi:10.53841/bpsneur.2019.1.8.52

‘I realised I'm not the only one’: A service evaluation of an ‘adjustment to acquired brain injury group in neurorehabilitation

2019· article· en· W4315748588 on OpenAlexaff
O’Keeffe Fiadhnait, Cogley Clodagh, Schnittger Rebecca, O’Loughlin Emer, Higgins Andrea

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neuropsychologist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurorehabilitationAcquired brain injuryPsychologyRehabilitationService (business)Applied psychologyClinical psychologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe implementation of an adjustment group for inpatients with ABI, reflecting the opportunities and challenges of delivery and evaluation of real-world clinical service initiatives. Realising that others had similar issues – ‘I’m not the only one’-helped to normalise and make sense of the emotional reactions and experiences of ABI. Facilitating groups focussed on psychological consequences of ABI is an effective and feasible way of increasing access to psychological support for inpatients with ABI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe NeuropsychologistSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207