ANFIS Model for Cost Analysis in a Dual Source Multi-Destination System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Managers face uncertainties while making allocation decisions, especially in dual or multi-source multi-destination inventory systems. Regrettably, many studies focus on classical methods as a technique for product distribution, which has never guaranteed a satisfactory solution. Real-life problems are non-deterministic polynomial-time hard (NP-hard), and solving such problems is relatively challenging. Such complicated problems need an efficient and robust computational hybrid algorithm. This study emphasises the need for a hybrid intelligent technique for effective product distribution. Soft computing hybrid algorithm, ANFIS was applied to product distribution in a double source multi-destination system. Rules were developed from available input datasets. Distributing products from dual manufacturing plants to fifteen available depots using the creative algorithm resulted in an overall 13.5% decrease in cost compared to the existing method adopted by the company. The result showed that the proposed method is relatively satisfactory and adequate for cost modelling. In addition, it is easy to use and outperforms the classical approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it