MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315752537 · doi:10.1113/jp283582

Fasting for 20 h does not affect exercise‐induced increases in circulating BDNF in humans

2023· article· en· W4315752537 on OpenAlexaff
Travis D. Gibbons, James D. Cotter, Philip N. Ainslie, Wickliffe C. Abraham, Bruce G. Mockett, Holly A. Campbell, Emma M. W. Jones, Elliott J. Jenkins, Kate N. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyBrain-derived neurotrophic factorNeurotrophic factorsIntermittent fastingAerobic exerciseNeuroprotectionChemistryMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intermittent fasting and exercise provide neuroprotection from age‐related cognitive decline. A link between these two seemingly distinct stressors is their capability to steer the brain away from exclusively glucose metabolism. This cerebral substrate switch has been implicated in upregulating brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein involved in neuroplasticity, learning and memory, and may underlie some of these neuroprotective effects. We examined the isolated and interactive effects of (1) 20‐h fasting, (2) 90‐min light exercise, and (3) high‐intensity exercise on peripheral venous BDNF in 12 human volunteers. A follow‐up study isolated the influence of cerebrovascular shear stress on circulating BDNF. Fasting for 20 h decreased glucose and increased ketones ( P ≤ 0.0157) but had no effect on BDNF ( P ≥ 0.4637). Light cycling at 25% of peak oxygen uptake () increased serum BDNF by 6 ± 8% (independent of being fed or fasted) and was mediated by a 7 ± 6% increase in platelets ( P < 0.0001). Plasma BDNF was increased from 336 pg l −1 [46,626] to 390 pg l −1 [127,653] by 90‐min of light cycling ( P = 0.0128). Six 40‐s intervals at 100% of increased plasma and serum BDNF, as well as the BDNF‐per‐platelet ratio 4‐ to 5‐fold more than light exercise did ( P ≤ 0.0044). Plasma BDNF was correlated with circulating lactate during the high‐intensity intervals ( r = 0.47, P = 0.0057), but not during light exercise ( P = 0.7407). Changes in cerebral shear stress – whether occurring naturally during exercise or induced experimentally with inspired CO 2 – did not correspond with changes in BDNF ( P ≥ 0.2730). BDNF responses to low‐intensity exercise are mediated by increased circulating platelets, and increasing either exercise duration or particularly intensity is required to liberate free BDNF. image Key points Intermittent fasting and exercise both have potent neuroprotective effects and an acute upregulation of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) appears to be a common mechanistic link. Switching the brain's fuel source from glucose to either ketone bodies or lactate, i.e. a cerebral substrate switch, has been shown to promote BDNF production in the rodent brain. Fasting for 20 h caused a 9‐fold increase in ketone body delivery to the brain but had no effect on any metric of BDNF in peripheral circulation at rest. Prolonged (90 min) light cycling exercise increased plasma‐ and serum‐derived BDNF irrespective of being fed or fasted and seemed to be independent of changes in cerebral shear stress. Six minutes of high‐intensity cycling intervals increased every metric of circulating BDNF by 4 to 5 times more than prolonged low‐intensity cycling; the increase in plasma‐derived BDNF was correlated with a 6‐fold increase in circulating lactate irrespective of feeding or fasting. Compared to 1 day of fasting with or without prolonged light exercise, high‐intensity exercise is a much more efficient means to increase BDNF in circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207