Power Allocation for a HAPS-Enabled MIMO NOMA System with Spatially Correlated Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-altitude platform station (HAPS) systems are considered to have great promise in the multi-tier architecture of the sixth generation (6G) and beyond wireless networks. A HAPS system can be used as a super macro base station (SMBS) to communicate with users directly since there is a significant line-of-sight (LoS) link between a HAPS and terrestrial users. One of the problems that HAPS SMBS systems face, however, is the high spatial correlation between the channel gain of adjacent users, which is due to the LoS link between the HAPS and terrestrial users. In this paper, in addition to utilizing the spatial correlation of channel gain between multiple users to improve user services, we consider correlated channel gain for each user. In the proposed method, terrestrial users with a high spatial correlation between their LoS channel gain are grouped into non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) clusters. Next, an algorithm is proposed to allocate power among terrestrial users to maximize the total rate while satisfying the quality-of-service (QoS) and successive interference cancellation (SIC) conditions. Simulation results show that a HAPS SMBS has superior data rate and energy efficiency in comparison to a terrestrial BS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".