Performance Analysis of Conditional GANs based Image-to-Image Translation Models for Low-Light Image Enhancement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the evolution of generative adversarial networks, popularly known as GANs for image-to-image translations, conditional GANs (cGANs) are explored and employed for various digital image preprocessing (enhancement and de-noising) tasks. The series of tasks includes image processing such as image enhancement, de-hazing, de-noising, resolution enhancement, and many more. In image enhancement, the area of increasing light (brightness) in low-light images (or poorly-illuminated images) is investigated in this work. For low-light image enhancement, the performance of pix2pix and pix2pixHD models has been demonstrated and analyzed. An analysis of low-light image enhancement using pix2pix model with other loss functions is also presented. Furthermore, pix2pix performance with instance normalization layers for low-light image enhancement is studied, and improved full-reference Image Quality Assessment (FIQA) metrics values along with entropy (a no-reference IQA (NIQA) metric) are reported. The quantitative and qualitative results are also compared with selected cutting-edge deep learning frameworks for low-light image enhancement. In this research, it is found that pix2pix model enhancement metrics are better than RetinexNet model. And the pix2pixHD results are comparable to the latest low-light image enhancement deep learning frameworks such as MIRNet and LLFlow. Furthermore, pix2pix models are lighter in size than MIRNet. The inference times achieved using pix2pix are the minimum on both the CPU and the GPU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".