MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315778117 · doi:10.12938/bmfh.2022-017

Phylogenomic analysis in <i>Latilactobacillus sakei</i> by using polymorphisms detected by next-generation sequencing

2023· article· en· W4315778117 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chisato Nishiyama, Suguru SEKIGUCHI, Yu Sugihara, Minami Nishikawa, Natsu Makita, Tenta Segawa, Momoka Terasaki, Hiroki Takagi, Takashi Koyanagi

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience of Microbiota Food and Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMitani Foundation for Research and DevelopmentResearch Organization of Information and Systems
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeBiologyLactobacillus sakeiGeneticsWhole genome sequencingLocus (genetics)HaplotypeGenomeComputational biologyGeneGenotypeBacteriaLactic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latilactobacillus sakei is a lactic acid bacterium used to produce a wide range of fermented food products. To understand their characteristics and adaptability to various nutrient sources, we applied strain-specific, nucleotide-concatenated (SSC) sequences to the phylogenetic analysis of 32 L. sakei strains isolated from various locations and products. SSC sequences were developed by concatenating the polymorphisms detected by whole-genome sequencing. This enabled us to use sufficient polymorphisms and avoid the bias caused by selecting partial sequences, such as that in core genome and multi-locus sequence typing. SSC sequence-based analysis revealed that the phylogenetic relations for L. sakei are based on the different nutrition sources rather than geographical distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience of Microbiota Food and HealthSame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207