MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4315780071 · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27832-9

Author Correction: Warmth and competence perceptions of key protagonists are associated with containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 35 countries

2023· erratum· en· W4315780071 on OpenAlexaff
Maria‐Therese Friehs, Patrick F. Kotzur, C. Kraus, Moritz Schemmerling, Jessica A. Herzig, Adrian Stanciu, Sebastian Dilly, Lisa Hellert, Doreen Hübner, Anja Rückwardt, Veruschka Ulizcay, Oliver Christ, Marco Brambilla, Jonas De keersmaecker, Federica Durante, Jessica Gale, Dmitry Grigoryev, Eric R. Igou, Nino Javakhishvili, Doris Kienmoser, Gandalf Nicolás, Julian A. Oldmeadow, Odile Rohmer, Bjørn Sætrevik, Julien Barbedor, Franco Bastias, Sebastian B. Bjørkheim, Aidos Bolatov, Nazire Duran, Andrej Findor, Friedrich M. Götz, Sylvie Graf, Աննա Հակոբջանյան, Georgios Halkias, Camellia Hancheva, Martina Hřebı́čková, Matej Hruška, Shenel Husnu, Kamoliddin Kаdirov, Narine Khachatryan, Francisco Guilherme Lima Macêdo, Ana Makashvili, Maylin Martínez-Muñoz, Eric Mercadante, Luiza Meseșan-Schmitz, Andreas Michael, Nozima Mullabaeva, Félix Neto, Joana Neto, Merve Öztürk, Svitlana Paschenko, Agnieszka Pietraszkiewicz, Charis Psaltis, Yuting Qiu, Mirjana Rupar, Adil Samekin, Katharina Schmid, Sabine Sczesny, Yiwen Sun, Annika M. Svedholm‐Häkkinen, Aleksandra Szymków, Enoch Teye‐Kwadjo, Cláudio Torres, Luc Vieira, Illia Yahiiaiev, Vincent Yzerbyt

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Perception2019-20 coronavirus outbreakKey (lock)Competence (human resources)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Containment (computer programming)PsychologyData scienceComputer scienceVirologyMedicineSocial psychologyOutbreakComputer securityPathologyNeuroscienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article contained an error in Affiliation 27, which was incorrectly given as ‘University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus’. The correct Affiliation is listed below:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.147
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.147
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→