Hábitos alimentarios en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios de Yucatán
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los estudiantes universitarios son vulnerables a la inadecuada alimentación por la naturaleza de la vida universitaria; necesitan consolidar buenos hábitos alimentarios, los cuales son un factor de importancia para mantener un buen estado de salud y prevenir enfermedades. Para evaluar el consumo de alimentos en estudiantes universitarios, se realizó un estudio transversal en una muestra de 271 estudiantes de 4 Facultades de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. Una tercera parte de los estudiantes desayunó diariamente, en mayor proporción las mujeres y jóvenes de la Facultad de Medicina. El consumo recomendado de frutas, verduras y legumbres, lácteos, pescado y alimentos integrales fue bajo, en cambio hubo elevada ingesta de comida rápida, frituras, galletas y dulces. Es recomendable fomentar programas educativos en alimentación saludable y actividad física que beneficien a la comunidad universitaria como insumo a su formación integral y con el fin de proteger del riesgo de enfermedades no transmisibles en el futuro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".