FEM-Inclusive Transfer Learning for Bistable Piezoelectric MEMS Energy Harvester Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a bistable piezoelectric MEMS energy harvester is presented to operate in a low-frequency range, around 100–200 Hz. The proposed design has an M-shaped structure with a couple of proof masses to not only lower the operating frequencies but also enlarge the frequency bandwidth. This specific structure has multidegrees of freedom, making it fit for a bistable piezoelectric energy harvester on the MEMS scale. An artificial neural network (ANN) is used to tackle this design in order to facilitate the optimization process and determine proper physical dimensions. To improve the accuracy and boost the training process of deep neural network (DNN), we utilize a transfer learning technique in this work. The analytical modeling and finite-element modeling (FEM) simulation data have been used for the DNN model training. Here, a DNN is first trained with a large dataset computed from the lumped-parameter model, and then, the trained network is transferred to a new DNN model for another round of training with a small dataset of highly accurate FEM simulation data samples to further reduce the estimation error. It is shown that the new model can estimate the device features with over 94% accuracy, which is considerably higher than the regular DNN. Next, the trained model is used as a performance estimator in a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the topology of the device to improve the operating frequency range and the generated voltage. An optimized design with a total volume of 1.02 mm3 was fabricated by the micromachining process. Our experimental results confirm that the proposed transfer-learning-based method can not only reduce the prototype’s first and second resonant frequencies to 123.8 and 175.7 Hz, respectively, but also enhance the generated power up to$2.83 ~\mu \text{W}$under 0.2-g input acceleration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".