Singularity-Robust Full-Pose Workspace Control of Space Manipulators with Non-Zero Momentum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We address the end-effector full-pose tracking control problem in free-floating space manipulators, experiencing constant non-zero linear and angular momentum. The aim is to develop an output-tracking (workspace) control law free of singularities due to parameterizing the end-effector motion and being robust against singularities of the input-output decoupling matrix (generalized Jacobian matrix). Space manipulators are modelled as open-chain multi-body systems with single- and multidegree-of-freedom joints, whose kinematics and dynamics are formulated on the Special Euclidean group SE(3). Such systems exhibit conserved (not necessarily zero) total momentum when operating in the free-floating regime, which we use to systematically reduce their dynamical equations by eliminating the base spacecraft’s motion. To avoid parameterizing the end-effector motion, we consider its full pose as the system output and develop a novel feedback linearization technique on the matrix Lie group SE(3) in the reduced phase space of the space manipulator. We then propose an intrinsic feedforward, feedback proportional-integral-derivative workspace controller involving a coordinate-free pose error function on SE(3) and velocity error on its Lie algebra. Using a Lyapunov candidate, this controller is proven to stabilize the end-effector pose to a feasible desired trajectory. The input-output decoupling matrix in the proposed control law can lose rank at some regions of the configuration space; hence, we implement a singularity-robust inverse, derived from the damped least squares method, to avoid impractical joint torques in these regions. The developed controller is implemented on a 7-degree-of-freedom manipulator onboard a spacecraft and its efficacy and robustness are demonstrated trough series of simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".