Trajectory tracking control based on prescribed performance and fractional-order state observer for unmanned helicopters with unmeasurable states
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tracking control problem of trajectory planning is studied in this paper based on prescribed performance method (PPM) for the small-scale unmanned autonomous helicopter (UAH) with wind-gust disturbances (WGDs) and unmeasurable states. For the purpose, the nonlinear model with flapping dynamics is established, and the transformation performance function is used to ensure that the errors of trajectory tracking satisfy the corresponding performance. The fractional-order observers are investigated to estimate the longitudinal and lateral flapping angles that are treated as unmeasurable states, and estimate the WGDs, respectively. Based on PPM and the designed observers, the fractional-order theory-based backstepping trajectory tracking control scheme is developed for the UAH system, and the three-dimensional trajectory is planned by the improved wolf pack algorithm. Then the stability of the entire system is proven through strict theoretical analysis. Finally, the simulation analysis on the UAH are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the designed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".