MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316037426 · doi:10.3224/84742714

Die Vignette als Übung der Wahrnehmung / Nuove prospettive di professionalizzazione dell’agire pedagogico

2023· book· de· W4316037426 on OpenAlex
Evi Agostini, Hans Karl Peterlini, Jasmin Donlic, Verena Kumpusch, Daniela Lehner, Isabella Sandner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVerlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsWorld Wildlife Fund Canada
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftLibera Università di Bolzano
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pädagogische Arbeit erfordert die Bereitschaft, sich auf immer neue Situationen und auf Menschen in ihrer Verschiedenheit einzulassen. Dieses Buch bietet dafür keine simplen Rezepte an, wohl aber wichtige Schritte zur Professionalisierung im pädagogischen Beruf. Diese führen über eine offene Haltung der Wahrnehmung und die Einbeziehung von Leiblichkeit hin zur Einsicht, wie Lern- und Lehrprozesse neu oder anders verstanden werden können. Mit Vignetten und Beispielen werden Konzepte dargelegt und auf ihre Anwendung hin reflektiert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it