Lattice Boltzmann modelling of isothermal two-component evaporation in porous media
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mesoscopic lattice Boltzmann model is implemented for modelling isothermal two-component evaporation in porous media. The model is based on the pseudopotential multiphase model with two components to mimic the phase-change component (e.g. water and its vapour) and the non-condensible component (e.g. dry air), and the cascaded collision operator is used to enhance the numerical performance. The model is first analysed based on Chapman–Enskog expansion and then validated by the theoretical solution of an isothermal diffusive evaporation problem. We then discuss in detail the implementation of wettability based on a geometric function scheme and further validate the model with microfluidic evaporation experiments. We apply the method to simulate the convective evaporation of a dual-porosity medium and investigate the effects of inflow vapour concentration ( ${Y_{vapour,in}}$ ) and contact angle ( $\theta$ ) on the evaporation. Simulation results reproduce the typical transition from the constant evaporation regime (CRP) at large liquid saturation ( S ) to the receding front period (RFP) at small S , with an intermediate falling rate period in between. The dependence of the average evaporation rates on ${Y_{vapour,in}}$ and $\theta$ during CRP and RFP is investigated. A universal scaling formulation for the evaporation rate during CRP is found with respect to the concentration-related mass transfer number $B_Y$ , contact angle $\theta$ and inflow Reynolds number Re , i.e. $E{R_{CRP}} = {k_3}\ln \left ( {1 + {B_Y}} \right ) {\cdot } \left [ {\ln \left ( {1 + {Re}} \right ) + {k_2}} \right ]\left [ {\cos (\theta ) + {k_1}} \right ]$ , where ${k_1}$ , ${k_2}$ and ${k_3}$ are fitting parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it