PENGGUNAAN MEDIA VIDEO ANIMASI PADA MATERI HEWAN DAN TUMBUHAN DI LINGKUNGAN RUMAHKU UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS IV MIN 16 PIDIE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to improve the learning outcomes of fourth grade students of MIN 16 Pidie on animal and plant material in my home environment by using animated video media. The type of research is Classroom Action Research. The subjects of the study were grade IV students, totaling 12 students consisting of 7 male students and 5 female students with heterogeneous abilities. This research was conducted in 3 cycles using observation, test, and documentation techniques. The average score of students in the first cycle is 65.8 with 3 students' accuracy or 25% of all students. In the second cycle, the average score of students became 74.16 with student completeness as many as 8 students or 66.7% of the total students. In the third cycle, the average score of students became 90.83 with student completeness as many as 12 students or 100%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it