S2772 Subcutaneous Sweet Syndrome Successfully Treated With Ustekinumab in Patient With Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are well-established. Sweet syndrome (SS), or acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is a reactive mucocutaneous manifestation of IBD presenting as erythematous papules/plauqes with associated fever and arthomyalgias. There is limited evidence regarding efficacy of Ustekinumab in management of EIMs of UC, particularly SS. Case Description/Methods: The patient is a 50-year-old woman with left-sided UC (Montreal classification E2) that previously failed several therapies, including mesalamine, azathioprine, infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, and a fecal microbiota transplant trial. She presented with worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea/hematochezia, and bilateral lower extremity pain. She was febrile and tachycardic with tender, violaceous, and ulcerated subcutaneous nodules on the bilateral ankles with hemorrhagic bullae (FigureA). Labs revealed negative C. diff, elevated ESR/CRP, thrombocytosis, and borderline leukocytosis with neutrophilic predominance. Lower extremity MR imaging and bone biopsy revealed multifocal sterile osteomyelitis with adjacent abscess; skin biopsy demonstrated dense granulomatous/neutrophilic infiltrate in the deep dermis/subcutis without microorganisms, consistent with subcutaneous SS (FigureB). A restaging colonoscopy demonstrated severe proctosigmoid ulcerative colitis (FigureC). Given that the patient had failed several immunomodulators and biologic therapies, she was started on prednisone and Ustekinumab. Four months later, she reported complete resolution of her cutaneous SS off steroids and improving UC symptoms (less frequent and more formed stools, minimal hematochezia). Repeat MRI demonstrated resolution of the sterile osteomyelitis and abscess. Discussion: Our case highlights the novel use of Ustekinumab in the treatment of subcutaneous SS with sterile osteomyelitis in a patient with flaring UC. SS is a neutrophilic dermatosis that is a rare EIM of IBD, classically characterized by tender cutaneous lesions. There is limited evidence supporting the use of Ustekinumab in treating EIMs of CD, and a lack of data regarding its efficacy in treating EIMs of UC. Our case fills a major gap in the literature and highlights the clinical efficacy of Ustekinumab for SS and UC especially in patients that have a contraindication to, failed previous treatment with, or otherwise cannot tolerate corticosteroids and TNF-alpha antagonists.Figure 1.: 1A. Right lateral malleolus with 2.5 cm shallow erosion with slightly violaceous borders and central bright yellow fibrinous debris. There was slight atrophy of surrounding skin with mild edema and hyperpigmentation (left image). Left medial malleolus/dorsal foot with grouped irregular shallow ulcers with surrounding mild violaceous erythema (middle and right image). 1B. Left ankle biopsies showed mixed septal and lobular panniculitis with granulomatous and neutrophilic inflammation. Histologic sections show a mildly spongiotic epidermis with dense granulomatous and neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate in the deep dermis and subcutis (left image). The inflammatory infiltrate, which consists of prominent neutrophils, histiocytes, and scattered lymphocytes, surrounds vascular and adnexal structures, as well as adipocyte lobules. Definitive features of vasculitis are not seen. PASd (periodic acid-Schiff-diastase), GMS (Grocott’s methenamine silver), Gram, and Fite staining fail to highlight microorganisms (right image). 1C. Colonoscopy demonstrated severe (Mayo Endoscopy Score 3) proctosigmoid ulcerative colitis to 30 cm (left image). Sigmoid biopsies showed significant immune cell infiltration with crypt architectural distortion concerning for severe chronic active colitis. No evidence of granulomas, dysplasia or cytomegalovirus (right image).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".