MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316083300 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2022-021

Using Implementation Science to Optimize School Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic

2022· article· en· W4316083300 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kathy Short, Heather L. Bullock, Claire V. Crooks, Katholiki Georgiades

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern UniversityWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care
FundersMinistère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’OntarioGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsMental healthPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Context (archaeology)Psychological interventionPublic relationsPsychology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicinePsychiatryGeographyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Covid-19 pandemic has provoked a turbulent and uncertain time, especially for young people. Globally, schools have responded to the evolving pandemic using the best available insights, data, and practices. This response has included a renewed focus on the importance of school mental health as a protective and stabilizing influence. In Ontario, strategic investments in school mental health, inclusive of foundational infrastructure, scalable evidence-informed interventions, and embedded implementation supports, allowed school boards to mobilize quickly during Covid-19, and to act within the context of an overarching multi-tiered strategy. In this article, we describe foundational elements that contributed to rapid mobilization and response in school mental health service provision in Ontario schools during Covid-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0550.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.294
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207