Raconter des altérités avec Vinciane Despret. Une mimétique des devenirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article se propose de considérer certaines des accointances que l’œuvre de la philosophe Vinciane Despret entretient avec le fait littéraire. D’abord, l’attention est portée sur la façon dont la narration déploie une pensée de la conjonction à même de réélaborer les continuités entre humains et autres qu’humain. Ces liens sont ensuite définis comme des seuils à partir desquels s’autorise l’énonciation. Puis l’article s’attache à décortiquer des stratégies d’énonciation investies dans cette recherche de liens – leurres, jeux, feintes sémantiques. Enfin, l’on s’intéresse au rôle du subjectivisme auctorial et à la façon dont la littérarité l’introduit en sciences humaines et sociales, notamment à travers la question de l’impersonnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".