Variation in spatial dependencies across the cortical mantle discriminates the functional behaviour of primary and association cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent theories of cortical organisation maintain that important features of brain function emerge through the spatial arrangement of regions of cortex. For example, areas of association cortex are located in regions of cortex furthest from sensory and motor cortex. Association cortex is also ‘interdigitated’ since adjacent regions can have relatively different patterns of functional connectivity. It is assumed that topographic properties such as distance between cortical regions constrain their functions. For example, large distances between association and sensory and motor systems may enable these areas of cortex to maintain differentiable neural patterns, while an interdigitated organisation may enable association cortex to contain many functional systems in a relatively compact space. We currently lack a formal understanding of how spatial organisation impacts brain function, limiting the ability to leverage cortical topography to facilitate better interpretations of a regions function. Here we use variograms, a quantification of spatial autocorrelation, to develop a cortex-wide profile of how functional similarity changes as a function of the distance between regions. We establish that function changes gradually within sensory and motor cortex as the distance between regions increases, while in association cortex function changes rapidly over shorter distances. Subsequent analysis suggests these differential classes of spatial dependency are related to variation in intracortical myelin between sensory motor and association cortex. Our study suggests primary and association cortex are differentiated by the degree to which function varies over space, emphasising the need to formally account for spatial properties when estimating a system’s contribution to cognition and behaviour. Significance statement The spatial arrangements of regions in the human brain are hypothesised to underpin important features of a brain regions function. Currently, however, we lack a formal understanding of how topography shapes brain function, limiting our ability to leverage topographical perspectives to inform better theories of brain function. Here we use a formal mathematical approach to establish that in regions of association cortex function varies across the cortex more rapidly than in sensory and motor cortex, a phenomenon linked to levels of intracortical myelin. This result highlights how topographical features distinguish between cortical regions with different functional profiles and provides a formal account of how spatial differences support different features of brain function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".