MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316192741 · doi:10.29327/5153544.7-18

OCORRÊNCIA DA TUBERCULOSE EM POPULAÇÕES PRIVADAS DE LIBERDADE DE 2018 A 2022 EM MUNICÍPIO DA REGIÃO NORDESTE DO ESTADO DO PARÁ

2023· book-chapter· pt· W4316192741 on OpenAlexaff
Cloudo Luiz Colares de Carvalho Júnior, ANA PAULA CAVALHEIRO SOARES, GILSON FAGNER DE ASSIS ALMEIDA E SILVA, JOSÉ HENRIQUE SANTOS DA SILVA, MARCOS ANDRÉ COSTA ABREU, REBECA SILVA SIQUEIRA, DÉBORA ASSIS DA MOTA, EDUARDO DUARTE GUIMARÃES, ÉFESO THELYS GOMES COSTA, EMERSON MARCONE TAVARES ABREU, ISRAEL MACEDO DA ROCHA, THIAGO VICENTE GOMES FIGUEIRA, SILVAN FRANCISCO DA SILVA, Rossela Damasceno Caldeira

Bibliographic record

VenueEditora Pasteur eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Canadian institutionsPrivy Council Office
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEditora Pasteur eBooksSame topicHealthcare during COVID-19 PandemicFrench-language works237,207