Global patterns and key drivers of stream nitrogen concentration: A machine learning approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthropogenic loading of nitrogen to river systems can pose serious health hazards and create critical environmental threats. Quantification of the magnitude and impact of freshwater nitrogen requires identifying key controls of nitrogen dynamics and analyzing both the past and present patterns of nitrogen flows. To tackle this challenge, we adopted a machine learning (ML) approach and built an ML-driven representation that captures spatiotemporal variability in nitrogen concentrations at global scale. Our model uses random forests to regress a large sample of monthly measured stream nitrogen concentrations onto a set of 17 predictors with a spatial resolution of 0.5-degree over the 1990-2013, including observations within the pixel and upstream drivers. The model was validated with data from rivers outside the training dataset and was used to predict nitrogen concentrations in 520 major river basins of the world, including many with scarce or no observations. We predicted that the regions with highest median nitrogen concentrations in their rivers (in 2013) were: United States (Mississippi), Pakistan, Bangladesh, India (Indus, Ganges), China (Yellow, Yangtze, Yongding, Huai), and most of Europe (Rhine, Danube, Vistula, Thames, Trent, Severn). Other major hotspots were the river basins of the Sebou (Morroco), Nakdong (South Korea), Kitakami (Japan), and Egypt's Nile Delta. Our analysis showed that the rate of increase in nitrogen concentration between 1990s and 2000s was greatest in rivers located in eastern China, eastern and central parts of Canada, Baltic states, Pakistan, mainland southeast Asia, and south-eastern Australia. Using a new grouped variable importance measure, we also found that temporality (month of the year and cumulative month count) is the most influential predictor, followed by factors representing hydroclimatic conditions, diffuse nutrient emissions from agriculture, and topographic features. Our model can be further applied to assess strategies designed to reduce nitrogen pollution in freshwater bodies at large spatial scales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".