WaveTexNeT: Ensemble Based Wavelet-Xception Deep Neural Network Architecture for Color Texture Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recognizing real visual textures in the nature have been a challenging task since they are complex and stochastic.In spite of several decades of research, classifying the real world color textures are still challenging because of the intricate nature of the textures and the lack of substantial improvement of accuracy in benchmark datasets.Deep Learning techniques have found to be effective in identifying and classifying the texture patterns to a larger extent, but it could not capture spectral information and achieve excellent results for natural images.In this paper, we propose a deep convolutional neural network architecture, WaveTexNeT that combines Wavelet convolutional neural networks (WaveletCNN) and Xception model with luminance information for classifying real-world natural textures.Spectral and spatial features are extracted from WaveletCNN and Xception model.The highlight of the work is the utilization of spectral and spatial information along with luminance for texture classification.A color space image data augmentation technique is proposed that use luminance images from YIQ model for color texture classification.This work also throws light into the significance of luminance information for texture classification.Experimental analysis of the work reports that WaveTexNeT captures better feature representations and outperforms the accuracy obtained using the state-of-the-art methods.WaveTexNeT obtained an accuracy of 90.34% and 95.01% for the describable and material perception texture datasets DTD and FMD respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".