MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316464429 · doi:10.18280/ts.390632

Effect of DNN Approximation for Channel Estimation and Signal Detection on OFDM Applications

2022· article· en· W4316464429 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bircan Çalışır

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Multipath propagationChannel state informationBandwidth (computing)MultiplexingAlgorithmElectronic engineeringWirelessTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper offers a deep learning approximation to realize channel estimation and signal detection that creates the main communication structure skeleton for the orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) system known as an efficient modulation type on 5G. This letter offers an application of deep learning to handle the wireless OFDM channels' end-to-end conduct. First, channel state information (CSI) is predicted explicitly that differs from existing OFDM receivers, then detected the transmitted symbols utilizing the predicted CSI. In the end, CSI is predicted by the suggested deep learning approximation indirectly and transmitted symbols are directly recovered. The structure of the designed receiver occurs of a layer of DNN and soft decisions, which resolves the issues channel estimation error, time delay, and limitation of decoding between users in classic detection techniques. In the simulation results, it is observed that the receiver has powerful stability on the power distribution of user, not only convenient for the linear channel, but also for nonlinear channel when enhancement the number of users, also detection can be well on the receiver. Generally, the efficiency of the modulation system decreases with the features of the multipath channel utilized for transmission. Channel estimation and detection of symbols utilize to reduce the impacts of the channel, which needs high computation and bandwidth conventionally. This paper is used deep neural networks (DNN) for detecting the signal, in this way much effort in detecting the channel is prevented. The proposed method saves priceless bandwidth via used CP in OFDM with a big increase in SNR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207