MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316464479 · doi:10.52912/jsta.2022.2.4.231

A Review on the Space Human Resource Policy

2022· review· en· W4316464479 on OpenAlexaff
Shinmyeong Kim, Chol Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Space Technology and Applications · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTechnology Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Nature versus nurtureGovernment (linguistics)Human resourcesBusinessSpace policyResource (disambiguation)Operations researchEngineering managementComputer scienceEngineeringEconomicsManagementSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A systematic strategy is required to train future-oriented space manpower. To this end, in this study, the discrepancy between demand and supply of space manpower was confirmed in terms of major, education, and job. It is necessary to systematize the level and range of capabilities required for space potential manpower and space technology/research manpower, and the space manpower training policy considering this is proposed as follows. First, it is necessary to strengthen the infrastructure for training space personnel. Second, a policy to train space potential manpower is needed. Third, policies are needed to nurture space technology and research personnel. These results can be modified and supplemented by considering the human, material and social resources of the government and businesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Space Technology and ApplicationsSame topicTechnology Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207