Research on State Detection Method of Electrical Equipment Based on Wireless Sensor Network Signal Processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
False alarms and omissions of key measurement signals may even affect the reliability of decision-making in power IoT system, lead to safety accidents and bring huge economic losses. In order to improve the reliability of system operation and the information management level of electrical equipment, it is necessary to identify and extract suddenly changed signals from massive measurement signals collected by wireless sensor networks, and to detect the working state of electrical equipment by judging the source of signals. Therefore, this article studies the state detection method of electrical equipment based on wireless sensor network signal processing. In the second chapter, a cluster splitting and merging method is designed to solve the problem that the existing detection methods tend to ignore the imbalance of cluster size. In the third chapter, according to the data characteristics of measurement signals collected by wireless sensor networks, a similarity measurement criterion for composite time series of measurement signals is proposed, and the corresponding distance matrix is generated based on this criterion. In the fourth chapter, wavelet decomposition is used to decompose the initial measurement signals collected by wireless sensor networks, and then the signals are compressed twice based on compressed sensing. Then the abnormal signal data information is imported into support vector machine for training to realize the real-time detection of abnormal signals of electrical equipment state. Experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".