Integration of spatial and single-cell data across modalities with weak linkage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
single-cell sequencing methods have enabled the profiling of multiple types of molecular readouts at cellular resolution, and recent developments in spatial barcoding, in situ hybridization, and in situ sequencing allow such molecular readouts to retain their spatial context. Since no technology can provide complete characterization across all layers of biological modalities within the same cell, there is pervasive need for computational cross-modal integration (also called diagonal integration) of single-cell and spatial omics data. For current methods, the feasibility of cross-modal integration relies on the existence of highly correlated, a priori "linked" features. When such linked features are few or uninformative, a scenario that we call "weak linkage", existing methods fail. We developed MaxFuse, a cross-modal data integration method that, through iterative co-embedding, data smoothing, and cell matching, leverages all information in each modality to obtain high-quality integration. MaxFuse is modality-agnostic and, through comprehensive benchmarks on single-cell and spatial ground-truth multiome datasets, demonstrates high robustness and accuracy in the weak linkage scenario. A prototypical example of weak linkage is the integration of spatial proteomic data with single-cell sequencing data. On two example analyses of this type, we demonstrate how MaxFuse enables the spatial consolidation of proteomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic information at single-cell resolution on the same tissue section.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".