MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316656011 · doi:10.1017/9781800103474.147

Loppington House

2021· other· en· W4316656011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gareth Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Country Houses of Shropshire · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLand Rights and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)Connection (principal bundle)GenealogyHistoryGeographyArtEngineeringPhilosophyEpistemologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dickin family had a connection with the village of Loppington since at least the seventeenth century and the Lays, descendants in the female line, continue to own property there. Thomas, the younger brother of John Dickin of Loppington, married the widow, Anne Groome, in 1731 and was established at Aston Hall near Wem. His son and namesake, Thomas Dickin (d. 1805) made an advantageous marriage in 1775 to Sarah (d. 1803), daughter of Roger Atcherley of The Cross at Ellesmere (q.v.). She ultimately became one of the three co-heiresses of her brother, Edward Acherley. Thomas Dickin junior, who served as High Sheriff of Shropshire in 1799, built Wem Hall (now known as Park House). His arms, quartered with those of his wife, appear in the pediment of that house. Wem Hall appears to date from circa 1780 and may have been designed by Samuel Scoltock, the Shrewsbury architect credited with the design of Quarry Place House in Shrewsbury, or possibly William Haycock, the architect of John Ashby’s house at The Lion Hotel in Shrewsbury. Dickin added to his landed possessions with the acquisition of the Chambre family’s estate at Loppington which was sold following the death in 1779 of the Chambre’s representative Rev. George Legh DD Vicar of Halifax. The family, in 1777, also purchased Loppington Hall, a tall early eighteenth-century brick house of five bays and two-and-a-half storeys, which stands in its walled gardens in the centre of the village, and this, for at least a part of its life within the estate, was rented to a farmer. Thomas Dickin and his wife, Sarah, had a number of children, including Thomas Dickin (1781–1855). This younger Thomas married Jane, daughter of the Hon. Edward Massy of Chester, the second son of the 2 nd Lord Massy. Thomas Dickin appears to have been the first family member to be described as ‘of Loppington House’ or ‘Loppington Villa’ as the house seems initially to have been called. Thomas and Jane Dickin were evidently responsible for the conversion of an existing building into a fashionable Greek Revival villa at Loppington House to the north of the village. The wing of the house facing the north-west is composed of two linked blocks which appear to be the earliest sections of the property and may have been an earlier farmhouse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Country Houses of ShropshireSame topicLand Rights and ReformsFrench-language works237,207