De-Noising of Sparse Signals Using Mixture Model Shrinkage Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work a new thresholding function referred to as ’mixture model shrinkage’ (MMS) based on the minimization of a convex cost function is proposed. Normally, thresholding functions underestimate larger signal amplitudes during the de-noising process. The proposed model is a more flexible shrinkage function as it solves the underestimation problem to a greater extent and thus efficiently de-noises the signal without affecting signal amplitudes. The Expectation minimization (EM) algorithm is used to find the model parameters along with the majorization-minimization (MM) algorithm that minimize the monotonic cost function. The proposed model is then applied for de-noising group sparse signals and Shepp Logan phantom images. Our experimental study shows that MMS outclasses current thresholding functions and overlapping group shrinkage algorithm without results suffering from underestimation. Furthermore, the proposed model has the smallest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for de-noising group sparse signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".